On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > The following patch implements `%define api.pure' except that it doesn't > > update the skeleton or documentation for Java. Thus, b4_pure_if ends up > > unexpanded in comments in the generated Java code from above. This doesn't > > break anything, I believe. It just looks ugly. If you plan to follow soon > > with your patch, then I'll go ahead and commit mine anyway. Is that ok with > > you? > > Sure.
Thanks. I committed it.
