Hi Eric, On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Eric Blake wrote:
> Now that my copyright papers are complete, I rebased my m4sugar patches to > the current HEAD and verified that they allow operation with what will > become m4 1.6, whereas without the patch it failed. Is it okay to commit > these three patches? Yes, thanks. > Eric Blake (3): > ~ Fix comments in m4sugar. > ~ Partial m4sugar merge from autoconf: builtins, version.m4. > ~ Partial m4sugar merge from autoconf: m4_wrap vs. m4 1.6. Now that m4_wrap is FIFO, I believe the m4_wrap invocation in bison.m4 should be converted to m4_wrap_lifo. Otherwise, the m4_wrap text at the end of m4sugar.m4 isn't expanded last as intended.
