Le 16 juil. 09 à 11:19, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
Hi Akim. Sorry to be so late replying.
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Akim Demaille wrote:
I am still slowly trying to normalize the name of the variables we
will use in
Bison 2.6. This patch deprecates %error-verbose in favor of %define
parse.error "verbose".
I think "parse.error" is ok, but I'd be happy to receive other
proposals.
How about parse.error.messages or parse.error-messages? One day we
might
have, for example, parse.error.recovery to specify the recovery
mechanism.
Good with me. I will work on it.
Are you thinking there will be multiple properties that can be
configured
independently?
%define parse.error.messages.token "hide"
%define parse.error.messages.token "show"
%define parse.error.messages.value "hide"
%define parse.error.messages.value "show"
I don't know yet, but I rather expected the user code to be in charge
of what's to be displayed. Of course in the end it means to provide
yyerror with more values, so more %define options, yet I think several
%define bits to binary-or might be overkill. That's just guts
feeling, I have not looked into the details yet.
