Hi Paolo,
Below is discussed a difference bw the Java parsers and the others.
What opinion do you have about it? Do you see a means to converge?
Le 7 sept. 2009 à 09:55, Akim Demaille a écrit :
Hi,
I was tired to read
%parse-param {::parser::ParserImpl& up}
%lex-param {::parser::ParserImpl& up}
%parse-param {yyFlexLexer& scanner}
%lex-param {yyFlexLexer& scanner}
in my code, I wanted
%param {::parser::ParserImpl& up}{yyFlexLexer& scanner};
I pushed this feature in candidates/%param, but there are several
issues:
- I had not noticed, but when I started upgrading the documentation,
I discovered that in lalr1.java, the %lex-params are added to the
signature of yyparse, which in my case would have allowed to use
only %lex-params. It makes sense, but I am uncomfortable with the
coexistence of several conventions within Bison.
[This is in master, i.e., it will be 2.6. 2.4.2, and 2.5 should be
released before hand.]
