On Wed, March 17, 2010 20:34, Joel E. Denny wrote: > We plan for the XML output to be a stable user-visible interface to the > parser tables, so XSLT should be easier to maintain than internal Bison > code to support VCG. Surely xslt is easier to maintain.
> More generally, I see no reason to reject any decent XSLT contribution attached a update of xml2vcg.xsl with black text in the edge labels, then the graph is easier to read. Also want to try interface to tulip (GPL) which at first test did not work out in a nice graph when adding a tulip.c in bison. Can do it again using the xml and xslt. And thinking about yed from yworks, closed source java, but free for personal use and runs as web applet in browser. And hoping someday a java programmer can make some tool for bison with gvf which is GPL, but unmaintained. http://sourceforge.net/projects/gvf/ Thanks, Tys Lefering.
xml2vcg.xsl
Description: XML document
