On 08/01/10 21:36, Joel E. Denny wrote: > it seems that any diagnostic printed > on stderr is at least a warning, and I can see how the user might > appreciate a guarantee that -Werror will prevent him from missing any such > diagnostic. That seems to be the thinking at comp.compilers.
It also sounds reasonable to me. If this turns into a hardship, we could add some complexity by having levels of warnings, and report only "serious" warnings as errors, or something like that. But I hope such complexity isn't needed.
