On 3 Apr 2012, at 13:19, Akim Demaille wrote: >>>> I was thinking about the API, like in >>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html#Initialization >>>> Actually, I was looking at the PDF, where it looks like: >>>> void * scm_with_guile (void *(*func)(void *), void *data) [C Function] >>> >>> There are special commands in Texinfo to support functions, >>> indeed, but here the case is different. >>> >>> I may "cheat" with Texinfo and let it think that "return" is >>> the return type, and the ";" are the arguments: >> >> Ideally, Texinfo might be need some changes, but I'm not sure it is being >> developed. > > yes, it is, but in this case, I don't want to have to wait > for them to release something for us.
Perhaps something for the future. > Here is my proposal. I think it is OK: I patched what was patchable on 2.5 and checked the PDF. It looks a bit unusual with the extra space before ';', but the semicolon should probably be there, to indicate correct usage. Hans
