> Le 13 sept. 2018 à 11:16, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> a écrit : > > >> On 12 Sep 2018, at 23:45, Frank Heckenbach <f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de> wrote: >> >> But if there was a more concise syntax, I'd like it. I had >> fantasized about a new keyword ("let") or a new syntax (":="), but >> if "const" with implied "auto" can simply work, that would be great. >> But we're not designing C++ here, I know ... > > There is Unicode ≔ U+2254 COLON EQUALS if one dares leaving the ASCII range, > which in fact I am using in my own language, for definitions and Hoare logic > code. Nice idea, but too small a difference visually with the font I have right now. For definitions, you also have ≝ and ≜.
- Re: C++ preferences Akim Demaille
- Re: C++ preferences Hans Åberg
- Re: C++ preferences Hans Åberg
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support mov... Frank Heckenbach
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support mov... Akim Demaille
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support mov... Frank Heckenbach
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support mov... Akim Demaille
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support mov... Frank Heckenbach
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support mov... Akim Demaille
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support move sem... Hans Åberg
- Re: C++ preferences (was: RFC: lalr1.cc: support mov... Akim Demaille
- Re: C++ preferences Hans Åberg