Thanks, that's a good question. Here's my thoughts:

1) Generally, we should have a good reason to change the wording. Even if it's currently not ideal, it creates a disturbance to change such words after many years in a software with a large user base. I would expect some users to ask the question if Back In Time has changed its behavior after the change in wording.

2) To me, a "snapshot" is associated with partial/incremental backups (in the sense that each "snapshot" is incomplete by itself). This might contribute to the usual confusion about the way we store hardlinks. This could be a good reason to change "snapshot" to "backup".

3) The word "backup" creates a stronger impression that each "backup" is a complete set of files from the source (which is true, because we use hardlinks). This would also be a good reason to change the wording.

Hope I've made myself clear :)
Michael

On 05.11.2024 12:02, [email protected] wrote:
Hello folks,

I am interested in your opinions about this.

Looking into my foggy memory it seems that I somehow asked this question before. But I couldn't find out when and where. So my apologize if this is a duplicate.

In my experience around BIT I would say that the term "Backup" is more appropriate for what we currently call "Snapshot". So I would like to change that.

- For someone not knowing BIT (e.g. potential new users and translators) the term "Backup" is clearer. - Snapshot might be understood by some people as an image of the file system. - When writing about BIT (in Issues, Forums, etc) most of the time I do use the term "backup" out of the stomach without thinking about it.

I do understand that "Snapshot" is kind of fancy and points to the timeline feature. But I would prefer to use the technical correct term "Backup" instead of a marketing term.

What do you think?

Regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
Bit-dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/bit-dev.python.org/
Member address: [email protected]

Reply via email to