> This solves your test case but not one where for example you had a > package foo with a dependency on "nano" and then you: > > "bitbake foo nano-2.0.6"
Well, you are right. I didn't think about this case. by now I will just use PREFERRED_VERSION for my packages and when I have time I will take a look and see if I can do something to help. Thanks Vivi. > The real problem is the broken providers handling, not the fact pn is in > the RDEPENDS multiple times so I can't apply that patch. > > > > PS: I've already opened the bug > > http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4230 > > Don't you thing that is better we move this discussion to the bugtracker? > > Yes, I'll respond there if I get any further with this. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > -- Rodrigo Vivi INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br GPG: 0x905BE242 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net _______________________________________________ Bitbake-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-dev
