On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 11:53 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 10:43 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > i suspected as much, and i wasn't sure how much of an issue that > > > was based on how many people actually read it. but it's *way* > > > past time for me to figure out the details of bitbake and OE and > > > this seems like an easy way to start. > > > > > > if someone wants to apply patches that i submit (or NAK them and > > > tell me why), i'l be happy to start attempting to fix the manual, > > > as that's clearly a good way for me to start learning this stuff. > > > > > > i've already submitted a small number, so if someone wants to > > > take charge of applying them in short order so i can pull them > > > back and keep building on top of them, i'm up for that. > > > > I will apply them you can rest assured of that. I had a quick look > > and they looked good so far. I am pulled between many things though > > so I might not be as responsive as either of us would like :/. I'll > > probably apply them in batches. > > or (and here's a suggestion) you could give me commit access on the > bitbake repo. if all i'm doing is fixing documentation, it's unlikely > i'll be breaking anything. :-) it's entirely up to you.
I would like to review the changes (e.g. the patch one was better removed than documented). Would you be happy pushing a git branch which we could then merge once reviewed? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Bitbake-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-dev
