On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Christopher Larson wrote:
> It's interesting that you found local tarballs in the OE repository,
> however. The only valid reason I can see would be for binary-only
> packages. Missing upstream isn't a valid argument for this. We have
> a mirror / website we can use to archive such things.
what those tarballs are doing in the OE repo is outside the scope of
what i'm messing with here, so i'll leave it in the hands of the OE
admins (some of whom i assume read this list) to figure out what, if
anything, to do about them.
i suggest just searching for any of *tar.gz or *tar.bz2 in the OE
checkout and figuring out what those tarballs represent.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Bitbake-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-dev
