On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:40 +0600, Constantine Plotnikov wrote: > I suggest introducing notion of facet to the language. This is commonly > needed construct for system libraries.
We are deferring any object-oriented features. Getting the theory base for the language as it is now is already an overwhelming task. However, can you explain why facets are relevant to system libraries? > Also > something like this will be needed for CapIDL anyway. CapIDL definitely does *not* need language support for facets at all. shap _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
