On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 05:34:22PM -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > J�rgen, all: > > This is a non-productive discussion, because the system we are arguing > about has nothing to do with the system that BitC is likely to > implement. > I hope that it will be possible to read about the kind of system that BitC is likely to implement, before the decision is final.
> I propose that instead of trying to answer this discussion > now, our energy would be better spent if we wait until there is a > concrete proposal on the table. > Good idea, I look forward to a constructive discussion when the topic reemerges, which presumably is after there exists a working BitC compiler and a bootable Coyotos system. -- Sincerely | Homepage: J�rgen | http://www.hex.no/jhf | Public GPG key: | http://www.hex.no/jhf/key.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
