With the removal of defmacro, we have four bits of syntax that may want
to be restored:
(type-qualify e t) => e:t
(struct-ref e ident) => e.ident
(sequence-ref e ndx) => e[ndx]
(deref e) => e^
My personal inclination is NOT to support the lisp-style forms, but
another valid view would be to say that the lisp-style forms are
canonical and the inline forms are convenience syntax.
Opinions?
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
