Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > 1. Captured by-reference arguments might be considered legal if > the closure is non-escaping. > > Swaroop: What is the status of our closure escape analysis? > At this point I don't even know if we are *doing* closure > escape analysis.
By closure-escape analysis, I think you are referring to the closures that capture some non-local, non-global variables which are themselves returned or captured (as opposed to the captured variables of the closure), right? We are not currently doing this analysis. Swaroop. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
