Yes. This looks very close to what I was thinking about. On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 13:19 -0400, Sandro Magi wrote: > Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > The problem that I anticipate here is that setting aside my personal > > like for LISP, the LISP-y surface syntax actually *does* suck, and it is > > going to present a significant impediment to BitC adoption. This issue > > tends to push me away from macro processing solutions at the S-expr > > level. > > D-expressions might be of interest [1]; macros as used in the Dylan > language. > > Sandro > > [1] http://people.csail.mit.edu/jrb/Projects/dexprs.pdf > _______________________________________________ > bitc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
