Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > It would be fairly straightforward to restrict imports such that an > imported name can only be bound to a single local alias name. This might > actually be useful, because it would let us say: > > (import Foo (collidingName as localSubstitute)) > (import Foo) ;; imports all unimported symbols, which would exclude > collidingName, because that is already imported and > bound > > I'm actually inclined to favor this. What do other people think?
I think it is fine too. > Frankly, it may be that hygienic import is of so little value at this > point that we should drop it altogether. I am also okay with this. If we restrict all imports to unnamed imports it subsumes the above case. Swaroop. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
