On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Constantine Plotnikov < [email protected]> wrote:
Hi Constantine, this all makes perfect sense. The piece I was missing was: > The statements could not modify variables from lexical context and the > values from outer lexical context are passed according to the same > rules as arguments of eventual method invocation. This is very different than the par operator from Occam, which is why I was confused. > So the "par" is easy to implement in E on the compiler level. And I do > not see any conflicts with neither capability discipline nor with E's > principles. > For your par, as opposed to Occam's, I agree. -- Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
