On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2. I'm increasingly convinced (however reluctantly) that mixfix is important
> in a non-sexpr surface syntax.
I hate mixfix too. Since your conclusion is already reluctant, perhaps
if you posted your rationale we could talk you out of it.
--
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev