On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> what means does the compiler use to resolve this ambiguity?...
Given the presence of BEGIN ... END in the expression syntax, I
speculate that the resolution for
let BINDING in EXPR ; let BINDING in EXPR
^
is to reduce rather than shift..
Ah. And now I see the operator precedence specification in section 6.7
of the specification. LET and friends have the lowest precedence, and
therefore reduce aggressively.
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
