On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Zorg 421 <[email protected]> wrote: > Personnaly I would let the caml like syntax, for not having to switch > between two habits for languages I do not use on a day to day basis.
I agree that would have been nice, but the OCaml let syntax is fatal, and the fact that BitC doesn't curry imposes some changes. I do think that we can stay within the "feel" of OCaml, though. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
