On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Pal-Kristian Engstad <[email protected]> wrote: > It would preclude the OCaml-ish style: > > let _ = printf ... in > let _ = printf ... in > let _ = printf ... in > ()
Not really: let _ = printf ... in and _ = printf ... in () end The goal here isn't to be OCaml. A variant syntax for the same idiom is not a problem in my view. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
