On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote: > The essential point you are making, though, is that there is no unit > smaller than a string that can faithfully represent either a character > or a glyph in the unicode world, and there isn't even a standard > representation for characters/glyphs (that is: there are multiple > normalizations).
i think the use of "string" is overloaded and confuses me, if not anybody else. i'd say there is no unit smaller than a sequence. $0.00000002 sincerely. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
