If that is the case, then why would one consider using C--? On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Sandro Magi <[email protected]>wrote:
> My mistake. They're planning to move away from the gcc backend, and I > thought I had read C-- would eventually go away given it's not really > being actively developed anymore, but I can't seem to find where I got > that idea. I'd wager their C-- support will depend on how well LLVM > adapts to support their needs in the near future, since maintaining > native backends is a lot of work. > > Sandro
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
