On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Christopher Gilbreth <cngilbr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Perhaps one should opt for consistency one way or the other, that is, > either fn everywhere, or fn nowhere. > I'll see if I can make the parse issue go away so that we can explore this. I think I probably can. > Is it significantly faster to parse when "fn" is always there? > No, but it's a badly ambiguous parse when it is *not* there. > What about the option of using "fn" in place of "lambda" for anonymous > functions? > Given the decision to adopt tuples as our argument structure, I actually think we could adopt the C#-style delegate syntax. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list bitc-dev@coyotos.org http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
