On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva < [email protected]> wrote:
> Peter Van Roy and Seif Haridi... how their "dataflow concurrent > programming" could be supported in BitC? This exactly what BitC must *not* do implicitly. Imperative languages require much tighter control over order of computation. It has also been observed that debugging dataflow computation is a completely unaddressed problem in the literature. The idea itself is very old. There is no problem with supporting it; the problem lies in making it the default. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
