Because we are looking at a syntax change that may make it unnecessary, I
have reverted the <> change. We're back to () for the moment. We'll see
which way to go when we're done diddling the other elements of the grammar.

shap
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to