On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Sandro Magi <[email protected]> wrote:
> If BitC can provide this list but with memory safety and an easier > programming model than Cyclone, that would be a unique addition to the > systems languages space. Otherwise, I don't see anything ground breaking in > this list to differentiate BitC from the many recent systems languages: > Rust, Clay, Nimrod, D. > Well, I'm definitely NOT considering anything that would remove safety from that list! shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
