This makes a lot of sense and is more flexible.. and is more close to what
other languages do .

 

Not sure about the term "pure" though. I know  what its mean and its short
but It seems overloaded you already got pure  functions and  pure virtual
functions  . 

 

Ben

 



This also leaves us with "init-only" as a sensible thing to say about a
field.

I wonder if it isn't time to settle for "pure" and "init-only" (and possibly
"deep pure") for the current version of the language, and deal with more
complex cases later as justification emerges. This will tend to push a few
cases in the direction of references, but perhaps not enough that we should
care.


shap

_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to