Nothing wrong with not having it as your long term target  but what is your
long term target ?  We may be getting ahead of ourselves but you can still
run a pretty complete Linux box with only C and no other language support (
ie apart from scripting ) these things go like mollasses .

I  dont see the JVM or CLR going anywhere , JVM is like 18 years ...nothing
close to these run times and they are expensive build. .Latest trends seems
to be more native compiling. ( via C or via IR)    Haskell , Rust , Go ,
Microsoft are going back to native ( winrt and even talk of C# to native) ..

LLVM Jit compiler and GC are  going no where fast ... ( nor is Apple
interest in non native stacks for Ios)

Ben




On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]>wrote:

> Let me add that long-term CLR isn't a target of interest. CLR is now 10
> years old and needs to be replaced in any case.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to