> > So first: is there a* compelling and inarguable* reason to use a > different platform? I'm not interested in "Drupal sucks" or "I like X > better" answers. Answers of the form "We need to do X, Y, Z to be effective > as a community, and <this CMS> does those things better than Drupal does > with lower administrative overhead and lower security exposure" are > interesting. >
Yeah, Drupal is huge and centralized and requires a decent amount of webmastering. We just need: code and document version control, wiki-like and blog-like structures for sharing organized opinions and documentation, eventually bug triage, defect tracking, resolution management, etc. as we hope the project will outgrow one moderate-volume mailing list. fossil-scm does those things better than drupal because it is a package focused on supporting scrappy software projects like this. Its focus is on simplicity of deployment and maintenance, decentralization, collaboration, reliability, and attention paid to the needs of developers. ( http://www.fossil-scm.org) Ryan
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
