On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd like to clarify something: Both flavors of interface will be > observably separate wrapper objects, that is, with distinct object > ids? > Since I'm not sure whether we will even *have* object ids, I'm not sure how to respond. The real question would be whether EQ type checks over that reference comparison. > Mightn't it make more sense for voyeurs interfaces to report the same > object id, to better conform with the point of view that they aren't > wrappers, and aren't controlling permissions? > I don't think so. Voyeur interfaces are just as openable as guarded interfaces. They just have trivial guards. I think it would be better to keep the two kinds of interfaces as similar in behavior as possible. I think we should take the question of the object ID notion up separately. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
