On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
> word. it would be great for BitC to help add fuel to the fire against > dynamic languages ;-) but i'm not bigoted or anything... Keep in mind that I'm a (very passive) TinyScheme maintainer! :-) Dynamic type has its place, and in its place it's a very valuable tool. I just don't think that the place for dynamic types is the same as the set of all places in a given program. :-) shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
