On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote:
OK, now I think I understand this proposal better. I have no > gut-feeling objections to this. But a while back, you mentioned some > fancy code generation technique that's lighter than JIT, which you > were going to use for specialization. Does this AST rewrite aspect > cause problems for that technique? It doesn't literally have to be an > AST rewrite, I think. It could be prologue, epilogue, and call > sequence placeholders to fill in. Good catch. Yes, it definitely does mess with the simple generation technique. Though in truth I'm not sure how viable that technique is. For a while I thought it would work, but certain kinds of specializations don't play nicely with it. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
