On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote: > > In Shap's proposal it _was_ the definitions doing the picking. > > Actually, is that right, Shap? That's what I think you said, but it's > the opposite of what you'd seem to want if you want to know whether an > application allocates without looking things up. Yes. That's what I said. It's not necessary to look things up. The compiler will issue an error in the presence of a non-explicit allocation arising from application. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
