On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know if you think that issue has been resolved, but in my > mind, it hasn't. You still haven't given a correct account of how > upcast1_1to2 gets implemented. > > (You may have noticed that I also challenged Shap to implement it.) > I think shap agreed yesterday that it can't be done using the primitives we have on hand. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
