On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote:

> I hope this discussion isn't over for good. I was having fun, and
> function types are definitely worth putting this much thought into, if
> you ask me. I understand that you could be too busy for a while, but
> I'll be disappointed if BitC suddenly has finalized design decisions
> for functions without hearing how this discussion influenced the
> design.
>

Don't worry. I'm not that easy to get rid of. :-) Personal matters have had
my attention for the last several days.


shap
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to