On 1 May 2015 at 21:54, Keean Schupke <ke...@fry-it.com> wrote:

>
> I don't here anyone arguing for type-classes over implicits saying they
> want to remove first-class functions, but this would actually be the
> logical conclusion of saying type classes with global instance coherence
> are better than implicits?
>
>
​The intenion is to deal with the concerns you raised when you sited the
F-ing modules paper way back when, and some sorts of reasoning when dealing
with associated types.

-- 
William Leslie

Notice:
Likely much of this email is, by the nature of copyright, covered under
copyright law.  You absolutely MAY reproduce any part of it in accordance
with the copyright law of the nation you are reading this in.  Any attempt
to DENY YOU THOSE RIGHTS would be illegal without prior contractual
agreement.
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
bitc-dev@coyotos.org
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to