On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Keean Schupke <ke...@fry-it.com> wrote: >> > Haskell could be as fast as C++ if the >> > compiler was good enough at optimising. >> > I don't think it will ever happen. >> > On 3 May 2015 16:16, "Matt Oliveri" <atma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Me neither. What's your point? We started by discussing the >> correctness and convenience benefits of typeclasses vs. instance >> arguments. There's no difference in performance. > > The difference in performance between c++ where templates (which can be > modelled in a type safe way as type classes) and languages that have to use > dynamic dispatch is not small.
This discussion is important, in my opinion, but it has drifted away from type classes vs. instance arguments, so I'm replying in a new thread. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list bitc-dev@coyotos.org http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
