On 18 May 2015 17:07, "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <s...@eros-os.org> wrote: > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Keean Schupke <ke...@fry-it.com> wrote: >> >> To clarify I am suggesting a single, multi equals let as the way it should be done, not necessarily the way other people do it. > > > Clear, but not what we are going to do.
Then I would vote for no lets at the top level at all. >> >> In a pure functional language like Haskell you would need to be in the IO monad to write a REPL loop. > > > BitC is not a pure functional language, and is not intended to be. That's one of its strengths. The language can be the same, just the types of some terms are different. Keean.
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list bitc-dev@coyotos.org http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
