On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Keean Schupke <ke...@fry-it.com> wrote:
> You misunderstand, I am suggesting the compiler, which is copyright, > asserts in its license, the requirement that all users of the compiler are > required to release the type signatures of their programs as public domain. > I doubt very much that this would be enforceable. In any case, it's the wrong approach. It's fine to want interfaces to be freely usable, but public domain isn't the appropriate tool for the job. A better tool would be a suitable license embedded in the files. shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list bitc-dev@coyotos.org http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
