On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <[email protected] > wrote:
> > Since it's possible that block timestamps aren't chronological in order, > what would happen if a block following a size increase trigger is back in > the past before the size increase? Would that block have a lower size > restriction again? Would using block height not be a more stable number to > work with? > The activation or not rule is purely timestamp based. Blocks with a timestamp less than 1452470400 have a limit of 1MB. There could be an 8MB block followed by a block that is limited to 1MB.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
