On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Adam Back via bitcoin-dev > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ignored the warnings. Many also warned that 75% was an optimally BAD >> trigger ratio (and that in a hard fork it is not a miner vote really >> as in soft-forks). Gavin & Mike ignored that warning to. I know they >> heard those warnings because I told them 1:1 in person or via email >> and had on going conversations. Others did too. > > I would like to add for the record, I also warned Gavin of this in his > PR to Bitcoin Core, and also suggested a timeout which if > activation/enforcement did not occur within, hard fork deployment > would be cancelled. His response was to delete these from the PR > claiming thresholds were not relevant conversation in his PR and > belonged elsewhere (even though they had already been discussed > elsewhere).
I don't know the timeline for this, but maybe he was referring to http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009731.html (where he is one of the few people that have participated). _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
