To clarify, although I have defended the deployment of segwit as a hardfork, I have no strong opinion on whether to do that or do it as a softfork first and then do a hardfork to move things out of the coinbase to a better place. I have a strong opinion against never doing the later hardfork though. I would have supported segwit for Bitcoin even if it was only possible as a hardfork, but there's a softfork version and that will hopefully accelerate its deployment. Since the plan seems to be to do a softfork first and a hardfork moving the witness tree (and probably more things) outside of the coinbase later, I support the plan for segwit deployment. In fact, the plan is very exciting to me. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-de... Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-de... Adam Back via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity i... Chris via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity i... Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capaci... Justus Ranvier via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capaci... Alex Morcos via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capaci... Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] C... Douglas Roark via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capaci... Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] C... Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-de... Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for ... Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases... Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases... Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for ... Daniele Pinna via bitcoin-dev