On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev < [email protected]> wrote:
> To maximize fork divergence, it might make sense to require this. Any > sensible proposal for a hard fork would include a change to the sighash > anyway, so might as well make it required, no? > Compatibility with existing transaction-signing software and hardware should be considered. I think any hard fork proposal should support a reasonable number of reasonable-size old-sighash transactions, to allow a smooth transaction of wallet software and hardware and to support anybody who might have a hardware wallet locked away in a safe deposit box for years. -- -- Gavin Andresen
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
