> On 2 Jun 2018, at 2:15 AM, Russell O'Connor <rocon...@blockstream.io> wrote:
> I prefer a different opcode for CHECKSIGFROMSTACK because I dislike opcodes
> that pop a non-static number of elements off the stack. Popping a dynamic
> number of stack elements makes it more difficult to validate that a Script
> pubkey doesn't allow any funny business.
Agreed. This is one of the reasons I think we should remove CHECKMULTISIG in
the new script system
bitcoin-dev mailing list