Le 24/06/2014 11:44, Wladimir a écrit : >> But IMO this is a passed stage. SPV wallets w/ Bloom filtering can >> work without any special servers, so why require a 'close binding' to >> a trusted bitcoin core? > > To clarify (and not piss off ThomasV :-): I do not think the idea of > having servers with a reputation of their own is a passed stage. There > are many things that cannot be done at SPV level security with just > the P2P protocol yet. So having fewer but more trusted Electrum > servers is a reasonable compromise. >
Thanks for that :) Note that my goal is to make the Electrum servers as trustless as possible, and not to rely on some sort of 'reputation'. Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
