On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Matt Whitlock <[email protected]> wrote:
> To be more in the C++ spirit, I would suggest changing the (const 
> std::vector<unsigned char> &sig, size_t &off) parameters to 
> (std::vector<unsigned char>::const_iterator &itr, std::vector<unsigned 
> char>::const_iterator end).

I agree that is more in the spirit of C++, but part of the motivation
for including C++ code that it mostly matches the exact code that has
been used in the past two major Bitcoin Core releases (to interpret
signatures as standard).

-- 
Pieter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

Reply via email to