On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Matt Whitlock <b...@mattwhitlock.name> wrote: > To be more in the C++ spirit, I would suggest changing the (const > std::vector<unsigned char> &sig, size_t &off) parameters to > (std::vector<unsigned char>::const_iterator &itr, std::vector<unsigned > char>::const_iterator end).
I agree that is more in the spirit of C++, but part of the motivation for including C++ code that it mostly matches the exact code that has been used in the past two major Bitcoin Core releases (to interpret signatures as standard). -- Pieter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
