On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Luke-Jr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > If we prepare the git repository + tags, would you guys be > willing to make the actual release builds + source, and/or post such on the > websites you administrate? > Luke and various others in #bitcoin-stable
My initial reaction is no. Testing and bug-fixing is the bottleneck for making core bitcoin better, and maintaining two release lines won't make that better. I also think that until we get to a "1.0" that we can all agree is ready for everybody AND their grandma to use, using the word "stable" would be dishonest. Would we link to your binaries if you want to create 0.4.* releases, build binaries, then QA test and release them? I dunno-- what do other people think? Eventually, when there are a bunch of bitcoin implementations to choose from, I think bitcoin.org should look like bittorrent.org -- it should become a forum for developers to exchange ideas about the direction of bitcoin. -- -- Gavin Andresen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
